Testing Wittgenstein’s Dismissal of Experimental Psychology against Examples

نویسنده

  • Stewart Candlish
چکیده

The confusion and barrenness of psychology is not to be explained by calling it a “young science”; its state is not comparable with that of physics, for instance, in its beginnings. (Rather with that of certain branches of mathematics. Set theory.) For in psychology there are experimental methods and conceptual confusion. (As in the other case conceptual confusion and methods of proof.) The existence of the experimental method makes us think we have the means of solving the problems which trouble us; though problem and method pass one another by.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Tractarian objects and logical categories

It has been much debated whether the Tractarian objects are what Russell would have called particulars or whether they include also properties and relations. This paper claims that the debate is misguided: there is no logical category such that Wittgenstein intended the reader of the Tractatus to understand his objects either as providing examples of or as not providing examples of that categor...

متن کامل

Williamson on Wittgenstein’s “Family Resemblances” and the Sorites Paradox

In a short section of his book Vagueness, Timothy Williamson attempts to resolve a paradox regarding the expansion of Wittgenstein’s ‘family resemblance’ concepts, as they are described in his Philosophical Investigations Williamson contends that certain ‘family resemblance’ concepts such as “game” seem to have the capability to expand through a network of resemblances to become applicable to e...

متن کامل

Wittgenstein, Carnap and the New American Wittgensteinians

James Conant, a proponent of the ‘New American Wittgenstein’, has argued that the standard interpretation of Wittgenstein is wholly mistaken in respect of Wittgenstein’s critique of metaphysics and the attendant conception of nonsense. The standard interpretation, Conant holds, misascribes to Wittgenstein Carnapian views on the illegitimacy of metaphysical utterances, on logical syntax and gram...

متن کامل

Laterality of Motor Control before the Advent of Experimental Psychology: Revisiting David Kinnebrook’s “Error of Judgement” at Greenwich in 1796

Background: The dismissal of David Kinnebrook as an astronomical laborer in 1796 has afforded him a special position in the history of experimental psychology: “a martyr of science.” This is because he was “ushered away” from his work at the Royal Greenwich Observatory through no fault of his own. Here, using data available in the literature and insights from a new understanding in laterality o...

متن کامل

The Relationship between Stylish Characteristics of Wittgenstein’s Writing and his Philosophizing

Style and form of Wittgenstein’s writing are unique in contemporary philosophical literature. Thinkers take different stands about role of style and form of writing in Wittgenstein’s works. Some of them considered form and style to be aesthetic element which weakens argumentations of his text. In contrast, the others, believe that he was aware of diverse options of form and style and chosen his...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002